During the debates before the Civil War, vigilante and terrorists acts by Americans were a common occurrence. America is revisiting its past as witnessed from the actions of disgruntled losers in the health care debate. Boys and girls are taught to be good sports when they lose an argument, game, event, or fight. It has taken nearly 100 years for American to adopt a comprehensive health care law. President Theodore Roosevelt, a Republican, first called for health care reform, which had the support of progressive health care reformers in the 1912 election, but it was defeated. During the Great Depression in 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, a Democrat, asked Isidores S. Falk and Edgar Sydenstricter to help draft provisions to his pending Social Security legislation to include publicly funded health care programs.
These proposed reforms were attacked by the American Medical Association as well as state and local affiliates of the AMA as compulsory health insurance. Roosevelt ended up removing the health care provisions from the bill in 1935. Lyndon B. Johnson was able to usher Medicare and Medicaid legislation through the Congress, and he signed it in 1965. Since then, no major change to how Americans received and paid for health care had been done. During President Bill Clinton's presidency, he tried to no avail.
President Barack Obama in 2008 states, “I'm determined to be the last president to deal with this issue."
Following the Sunday, March 21 adoption of the American Protection and Affordable Health Care legislation, past laden emotions have arisen showing their racy heads. These barbaric actions are rooted in a deep conflict that has been unleashed as a new day is struggling to emerge. Change for our nation is involved and those difficulties lie in the essence of white supremacy, and institutionalized racism. Calling elected official "nigger", and "faggot" as they move from one chamber to office buildings in the midst of during their work is untenable and should be challenged. It makes no sense for Americans to spit on each other. It makes no sense for Americans to lose their perspective and disrespect the leaders of our country in the chamber of legitimate discourse.
Respect, honor, and decorum standards are set so that the business of the nation can be conducted in a civilized democratic atmosphere where the environment is non-threaten, which will allow wisdom and reason to prevail. With intemperate raging in the walls of Congress and outside the chamber, key inflammatory words are spoken and rhetoric is used as symbols for further attacks and disrespect. For instance, without knowledge as to who specifically yelled “baby killer”, while in Congressional session, it went unclaimed for several days. Randy Neugebauer (R-TX) however, finally came forward acknowledging that he was the "Baby Killer" yeller during the House of Representatives floor debate on the health care legislation. The three-term member from Texas is an embarrassment to his constituents and the state. The issuance of a subsequent apology should not have been necessary and even with the apology he denies that the shout out of "Baby Killer" during Rep. Bart Stupak's (D-MI) speech was "not directed at Stupak."Well, to whom was it directed? It is unreasonable to start shouting out inflammatory words on the floor of the House Chambers without a sense of whom and to whom they are directed. This is an example of a nonsensical action.
Since the elected of Barack Obama as president of the US, many of our citizens have been in a topsy-turvy state of mind causing them to display uncommon action. Witnesses Obama's success is a disruption to their inner sense and security. That is what change does. It is new to have an African American president of the United States and many are still surprised that he was elected. With his election, according to official security sources, our country has increased spending on presidential security because of the new radicalism that has emerged. Indecencies that were leveled at Obama have now extended to other members of Congress, namely, Stupak while in the chambers. Remember it was Joe Wilson, (R-SC) who yelled "you lie" during the President's State of the Union speech. Now the disrespect and threats have been extended to other elected officials with the "Baby Killer" yeller and other terrorist's insulting acts, like
the spitting on a congressman, throwing bricks into lawmakers' offices and cutting energy supply lines in a family member's yard.
Many of the Americans who are experiencing these phenomena are getting this for the first time. For unlike the African Americans from centuries past, most of the legislators have not had to manage such risks and distractions as they sought to live a quality life. Without fear of losing life, livelihood, or the pursuit of happiness, they could participate in the democratic process.
So, what are we going to do about this highly energized group of domestic activitists who are on emotional edge? How do we advance democracy in a civilized manner without war? The war of words has enraged our citizens to act violently, and the First Amendment of the US Constitution does not protect these acts. These individuals who are engaged in vigilante antics and making derogatory epitaphs must come to realize that change happens and our awareness and consciousness will broaden with that awareness, and likewise change.
When state attorney generals use scarce tax-payers' resources making legal claims to the unconstitutionally of the new health care legislation, it is a political charade that the people of the nation should see as a transparent act of folly. This litigation filed by Gregg Abbott and twelve other attorney generals is seen as a ploy to keep the divisive debate going through the Nov. 2, 2010 elections. The losers who are working to keep opposing health care reform until they can win enough seats to gain votes is an unconscionable action as they spend tax payers' dollars.
The actions of these top state lawyers will take insurance away from the 32,000,000 Americans who have just gained access to it under the guise of the 10th Amendment. The 10th Amendment was ratified in 1791 and restates the Constitutional principle of federalism, which grants powers to the state when the Constitution does not grant them to the national government along with those that are prohibited to the states by the Constitution saying that those are reserved for the state or the people. This challenge will come herein. Tenth Amendment – Powers of States and people. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
May God bless, and I will see you next week.
